RSS
 

Archive for the ‘software’ Category

WordPress Hack Solution

11 Jul

Had not heard about this, so unsure how rampant the problem is – that said  the fix is already in – thanks to the guys at www.yodelay.com

WordPress Hack Solution

 

Stop The Press : A CEO actually called a customer ?

13 Nov

OK _ not strictly a customer – but another example of why Apple wins over and over. I know a lot of people bang on about Jobs and his one one liners, his arrogance, how dare he – blah bah – but how many CEOs anywhere even track their customers, partners, developers and vendors – much less respond in emails – or pick up the phone.

Good Story – and a such a contrast to a customer complaint I made to a company at the other end of the spectrum of Customer Centricity  (let’s call them American Airlinespost here)

A conscientious guy: Steve Jobs has a well-deserved reputation for creating great quality products and for his passion for excellence and user experience. I’ve also read that he is a detail-oriented executive and a hands-on guy who is intimately involved with his company’s work (in a way that few other CEOs are).
His phone-call reinforced those notions and went further to suggest that he was also a very conscientious guy who cared about people. The fact that he took the time to read my email, think about the app and then personally call me was amazing.

Passed on – with thanks to Cascade Soft

 

Gruber on Nack on Apple’s Control Over Native iPhone OS Software

14 May

Daring Fireball: Regarding John Nack on Apple’s Control Over Native iPhone OS Software

That’s exactly what’s going on. Apple is testing whether a tightly controlled and managed app console platform will succeed or fail based on its own merits, as determined by customers. There are different levels of competition. Apple has made its choice about how it wants to compete, and there’s nothing Adobe can do about it – other than proving Apple wrong by shipping compelling excellent software for Android.

Passed on – with thanks to : Daring Fireball

 
Comments Off

Posted in apple, business, code, link, software

 

Are photographers different to the rest of us ?

17 Apr

Ever since I was sent this NYT article: For Photographers, the Image of a Shrinking Path – NYTimes.com, I had been mulling this in my mind. Before that even. I picked up on one set of words … which I replay here to save you clicking through.

“There are very few professional photographers who, right now, are not hurting, said Holly Stuart Hughes, editor of the magazine Photo District News.

That has left professional photographers with a bit of an identity crisis. Nine years ago, when Livia Corona was fresh out of art school, she got assignments from magazines like Travel and Leisure and Time. Then, she said, three forces coincided.

They were the advertising downturn, the popularity and accessibility of digital photography, and changes in the stock-photo market.

Full disclosure - I am not – nor would I ever pretend to be a photographer, fine-artist, musician, write, sculptor or any other kind of creative professional ….. I am however someone who admires the work of a number of photographers, fine-artists, musicians, writers, sculptors and other kinds of creative professionals – and I currently happen to be working in a space that provides an aspect of business savvy to those photographers, fine-artists, musicians, writers, sculptors and other kinds of creative professionals.


So what is it about this article that made me tick ?

Well, two things;

1) It is like all the other articles that face off on the topic of the challenges of a photographer. It highlights the problem – provides not even an offer of a solution – and leaves everyone with a ‘woe is me’ attitude …. “Well – it isn’t so bad that I am having a hard time – so is every one else.

2) The world doesn’t owe ANYONE a living – so what are we going to do about it ?

No one can dispute that a photographers life is difficult these days. But sorry – everyone’s life is – EVERY industry and profession is having the rug pulled out from under its feet. It is a problem. But not insurmountable.

If you read other parts of the NYT and similar organs, there is much written about the importance of creativity and innovation and thought and leadership as the key to extricating ourselves from this particular swamp.

Last time I looked – photographers are part of that creative energy and drive that can lead us into the brave new world. Where is the leadership?

Before I move on to how that leadership might kick in how about a few more forces that collided with the three already picked out earlier.

  • A massive downturn in the US economy AND
  • A massive downturn in the Western economies AND
  • A massive downturn in the global economy AND
  • Levels of unemployment across the US not seen for 30 years or more AND
  • Low barrier of entry to be a photographer AND
  • Convergence of stills and video AND multimedia AND
  • Lack of understanding in the buying public as to what it takes to ‘create’ AND
  • No value associated with what a pro (in any field) does AND
  • No accreditation – if I can’t afford to use an architect to build my house – I don’t ask my sister’s friend who has done some doodles of a remodel on their place to design mine – why doesn’t that apply to photographers AND
  • so on AND so on AND so on AND so on

    A quick diversion into Music

    Cast your mind back 10 years ago – and the MP3 download revolution that was going to destroy the music industry. How life was going to never be the same. How this was it – the end of the Music Industry. Site after site went up allowing people to download and swap MP3s if not for free – then at a very marginal cost. The courts were used to push massive fines onto 12 year olds to pay up thousands of dollars in fines – what a WASTE. We knew it was wrong – we did it. You know what – they were right. The Music Industry is in its death throws. Thank God.

    BUT – Music is alive and well. Very well – thankyou very much. The creative energies are bursting out all over – and for us – the consumer – there is now so much choice it is hard to keep up – its like being back in the 60s again, with every day a new band or singer popping up – delivering their sounds … it is awesome !

    The old style music industry is of course not doing too well out of all of this – Musicians are going direct to their fan base, the distribution engines that used to be essential are being bypassed, there is no need to have ‘the Suits’ involved – that ‘MiddleMan’ is dead. (Of course there are plenty of other MiddleMen springing up – would you recognize a Social Media Optimization expert if they walked into the room ? (Clue – they are about 12 years old).

    The point is that the people that made the money out of music – Universal, Capitol, EMI, Sony …. yes – they are having a hard time. EMI in the UK is the latest disaster. And with Tower, Virgin, Sam’s Records – name your record store of choice all (pretty much) gone. I mean – where do you go to buy a CD today. A what ?

    But the musician is doing ok. I think. True. it is different. New knowledge is needed, but you no longer need to sell millions of records to make a buck. Will there ever be a band as big as The Beatles again ? I say not. Been there – done that. But don’t forget that for every ‘Beatles’ – there were tens of thousands of bands that never made it.


    I maintain there is an analogy at work here. Musicians give their work away for free to make it up in another bucket – eg Radiohead. Or perform for free – in the hope of selling their recordings (think buskers) (Two extreme examples). David Byrne of Talking Heads wrote a piece in Wired two and a half years ago called Survival Strategies for Emerging Artists — and Megastars take a read – two and a half years ago – this was before the recession – and still the Music Industry was in shock – but there was a way through.

    So – what could photographers do ? Who is going to write the equivalent article for the photographic industry ? Is there a single person of that stature, with that knowledge that could do it and would want to do it ?

    I have some ideas, even made a start. But I am not that person. Who the hell am I anyway and what do I know ? Actually – little. I am not an expert. I flit between industries and connect dots. I see something in Industry A – and wonder – would that work in Industry B?

    That is why I am passionate about this. The Photographer is not the only career hit by this problem – but is one of the few that can do something about it. I think. Easy for me to say – so shall we set about proving it ?
    Passed on – with thanks to : Rachel Lacour for the original piece.

  •  

    A Parable of Open v Closed and Expert v Crowd Sourcing

    11 Apr

    An interesting take on the battle of open / closed …. apple / google …. apple / adobe – etc – without too much getting on the band wagon – but rather coming at the open v closed issue from a design perspective.

    Not sure I totally agree with him but I sure don’t reject it either, and haven’t got an argument against – so what – conflicted ? Yes – because I love Apple and I love Open Source. And that right there is a seeming conflict.

    I took the piece as a kind of metaphor / allegory / parable – I just can’t bring the right word to mind for the battle all creative professionals (and in this category I include the ‘poets of the internet’ [that would be the coders] are currently facing. As ‘the price’ gets close to zero – how do you make money? And if ‘we’ all want to pay nothing to others – but we want them to pay us for our art, photographs, design etc – how does that reconcile?

    It is another tension that we have in the market place.

  • I can’t afford Apple – I will get a LInux box with OpenSource Software
  • I can’t afford a Wedding Photographer – I will have all my guests take pictures – I will even ask a few of them to focus on parts of the Wedding that I want to make sure are captured
  • I can’t afford a Commercial Shooter for the Annual Report, I will use images from a micro stock source
  • I can’t afford x, I will do y ……… simply fill in the spaces – there are many examples.The point is that both sides of these equations are working – to a greater or lesser degree – what is emerging is not the funds needed to do something – but the TALENT – as Vincent Laforet wrote in a post on Vimeo a few months ago …

    Tools are making $$$ less relevant and talent MORE relevant – the way it SHOULD BE!

    Anyway – take a read – enjoy – agree or not – it isn’t the end of the world either way :)

    Extract From David Malouf’s piece:

    Because open systems people lack patience and strategic thinking. Yup! I said it. There ya go! With very few exceptions (ok, Mozilla you’re off the hook), OSS systems have failed to deliver mainstream, compelling, engaging, successful products.

    As I listened to Apple talk about what they did to make their implementation of Multi-tasking work, it just started to really crystalize for me one salient point about Apple.

    It is not about the right feature, but the right feature done right at the right time.

    This means being thorough. It means understanding the ins and outs of your system. It means being patient until both design and engineering get it right, and not just get it done.

    This level of intentionality is something that open systems can’t deploy well if at all. If everyone is free, then no one waits. No one considers. No one designs.

    And to save you the click through – ‘he’ (the writer of this oiece) is but one voice, name David Malouf and according to his web site:

    David Malouf is currently a Professor of Interaction Design in the Industrial Design Department of the Savannah College of Art & Design (SCAD).
    Before taking this position, David was a Sr. Interaction Design for Motorola Enterprise Mobility where he designed software, webware, and hardware interactions and interfaces. Motorola was the last in a 15 year journey of practicing interaction design, information architecture, UI design, project management and other roles and positions working almost exclusively with thin client technologies.

    Read the full article here : Why people who favor open systems are at a disadvantage?

    Passed on – with thanks to Daniel S

  •  

    The Internet of Things is Here

    17 Mar

    This makes for a really interesting read. I love it when the internet web thingy and the real world (as we at least perceive it to be) come together. Hopefully meeting part of the network next week. When I found out what he was doing – and where he wanted to go – I couldn’t resist. The stuff is not the same as described here. But its stuff (good stuff – sorry – can’t be more precise) – and there’s money to be made.

    fridge_150.jpg


    It’s the same story as BandN v Amazon – compete on your terms – not theirs!


    Connect the dots. Make the jumps. Find the Blue Ocean. It’s just a small leap of thinking that can create a giant leap of change.

    consumer_electronics_20.jpg

    The Internet of Things – McKinsey Quarterly

    … the predictable pathways of information are changing: the physical world itself is becoming a type of information system. In what’s called the Internet of Things, sensors and actuators embedded in physical objects’ from roadways to pacemakers’ are linked through wired and wireless networks, often using the same Internet Protocol (IP) that connects the Internet. These networks churn out huge volumes of data that flow to computers for analysis. When objects can both sense the environment and communicate, they become tools for understanding complexity and responding to it swiftly. What’s revolutionary in all this is that these physical information systems are now beginning to be deployed, and some of them even work largely without human intervention.


    Passed on – with thanks to : McKinsey Quarterly

     

    Brand Elevation Through Social Media

    15 Mar

    A good read – and some great commentaries. To me – it hits the same problems that I originally had around the internet – people not getting it quick enough.

    Eg – Why did B&N lose to Amazon ? Because they didn’t take it seriously soon enough – and by the time it did resonate – they tried to compete with Amazon in Amazon terms.

    Now we have twitter and facebook and …. they are all being treated either too seriously – (( abandoning your own web site for a facebook page ? )) through to hardly understood (( twitter is another channel to broadcast)) … the winners will be those companies that consider everything holistically and engage openly. tough to do for command and control operations – hell – its tough to do for most operations – it means you have to let go a little (lot) … and be real.

    Which is the point of this piece ….. don’t just put a veneer in place – mean it.


    The Dots Need Connecting | Original Post

    Some of these companies are really taking the intent behind social media engagement – to improve their customers’ experience – and bringing it into the operations of their companies. Or, perhaps more accurately, they’re building companies that are equipped to deliver those kinds of customer experiences in the first place, and they’re deploying the social media tools as one way to do that.

    The trouble happens when the companies are building something like a Twitter brigade as a surface treatment, or an isolated channel. The folks manning the accounts aren’t really empowered to do or change much operationally, and there are still some significant shortcomings in customer experience via the call center or the website..

    It creates a disparate experience, and an inconsistent one that still doesn’t reflect well on the brand. It drives people to use Twitter, sure, but more because they are more certain of a response, and less because of deep affection for Twitter itself.


    Passed on – with thanks to : Altitude Branding

     

    Roambi – Your Data, iPhone-Style

    18 Aug

    Now this is a little ‘doo hickey’ wot i like ….


    Your Data, iPhone-Style


    Passed on – with thanks to : Roambi

     

    It’s Not About The Software Anymore

    15 Apr

    Now here’s a little ‘doo hickey’ that I picked up this morning. Bottom line – right on …

    “Value, in the form of enhancement and improvement of their business, is what the customers want to buy, not code. To deliver on that new product requires a manufacturer that knows how to design, produce, brand and deliver a relationship of mutual profitability to both parties, something worth maintaining over the long haul. That can only be done when relationship-thinking is embedded in the DNA of every department and member of the company.”

    Read The Full Article – It’s Not About The Software Anymore – Here

    It’s an old message, I would argue that is never been about the technology, and has always been about the customer – and the customer’s customer.

    That is is about the shifting power base from producer efficient supply chains to customer effective demand networks.

    Of course – in the past – focussing on a ‘technology edge’ could overcome shortcomings in that knowledge, and often it did, but – finally – the tipping point has been reached. To have good, efficient, technology that works, is efficient, keeps costs down, allows a customer to understand their customer …. in fact whatever it is that the technology does … that’s table stakes. It’s what you do, how you do it, who your team are – all that people and associated knowledge stuff that companies are (re) discovering – across the virtual corporation and into the virtual networks – that’s what counts.

    To a large extent, that shift has been lead and demonstrated by the ‘social network’ phenomena – but really isn’t one of the SN benefits that the customer has now been given a voice. Of course the single customer always had a voice. And occasionally a business listened. But now the enterprises cannot turn off the cacophony of millions of networked customers. They shouldn’t. But having heard – what do they do ?

    The rules have changed – again.

    Todays’ winners are about understanding, implementing, driving customer focussed business. Of course – everyone says that don’t they ? But how many implement it ? Make it happen ? That is the real difference.

    Passed on – with thanks to : SandHill.com

     

    Building a Web Site With iWeb

    16 Mar

    It was time to do it – my home domain had got into a real mess – so time to rebuild. I am not a programmer, and the site is nothing more than some fun – and a place to put stuff and amalgamate all of the various threads of my online world – so simplicity was the order of the day.

    I am also a big fan of Apple – so I thought – why not ?

    iWeb – here I come.

    I am just about there – and for those that are interested – some 60 or so pages of WIP can be found here.

    Here’s the thing though – I went into this knowing that it was never going to be as good as building a site with a real CMS – think Drupal or Joomia – and I didn’t want to do go up the learning curve for something like Dreamweaver – or even Contribute, that I have used in the past – so on the face of it iWeb is just right … no ?

    Well – it depends.

    Going through the process I documented a few really big annoyances that I think would make iWeb a lot better. If you have something to throw in the fray – please add your comments, including if you know any good workarounds. If this turns into anything substantial – I might just pop down to Cupertino to see if I can get an audience – any votes on my chances, or if they’ll listen ?

    Ok – so here goes.

    Sub Menus

    There is just no easy way to do add a sub menu – so once you get beyond 6 or 7 pages – either your menu starts to wrap around the top – or you have to add in manual links to the extra pages.

    Create Once – Use Many

    No way to create a piece of content and reuse it many times. Say on a hidden page you could create some copy that through some kind of include – or pointer allows that copy to appear in many different places on the site … kind of like this in a ‘real’ site :

    Header and Footers

    Footers and Headers should be able to be set and appear same way on every page as default – with option to change page by page – section by section.

    SEO

    SEO – there really is no allowance for it at all. Now I am not going to get all fussed and fluffed around this – but how hard would it be to include routines to – there is simply no way to readily accommodate good SEO practice – is there ?

    Page Naming

    Any page has a single name – so what i call it in the iweb navigation is what it is called in the visible navigation – is what it reads in the browser when the site is visited – why not allow the builder to create page names for easier navigation in iweb – have a user friendly name for inclusion in navigation – and a fuller more descriptive name that appears in the browser ?
    All of this could be done with page properties

    Page Properties

    And while we are on that topic – why not also – for each page have the ability to add meta tags for description, keywords and robots ? These could be set up as a default site entry – and then overwritten by the site builder as needed – or not at all.

    iWeb Navigation

    wouldn’t it be good to have the possibility to folder pages in the iweb nav – much as the photos pages work – but all pages – and while we are at it – did you know that if you wanted to publish (say) ../me/index.htm into two different sub directories on your main site – you can’t. Why ? Because you can’t have two sites in iweb both called me !

    Finally – if anyone out there says I am wrong – and I just don’t know what I am doing – please let me know – and point me at the resource that gets around these challenges.