RSS
 

Archive for the ‘politics’ Category

How The Tax System Works

19 Dec

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.


The fifth would pay £1.


The sixth would pay £3.


The seventh would pay £7.


The eighth would pay £12.


The ninth would pay £18.


The tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.

So, that’s what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the
arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. ‘Since you are all
such good customers,’ he said, ‘I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily
beer by £20.’ Drinks for the ten now cost just £80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the
first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what
about the other six men – the paying customers? How could they divide the
£20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share?’

They realized that £20 divided by six is £3.33. But if they subtracted that
from everyone’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end
up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would
be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he
proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).


The sixth now paid £2 instead of £3 (33%savings).


The seventh now pay £5 instead of £7 (28%savings).


The eighth now paid £9 instead of £12 (25% savings).


The ninth now paid £14 instead of £18 (22% savings).


The tenth now paid £49 instead of £59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to
drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare
their savings.

‘I only got a pound out of the £20,’ declared the sixth man. He pointed to
the tenth man, ‘but he got £10!’

‘Yes, that’s right,’ exclaimed the fifth man. ‘I only saved a pound, too.
It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I did’

‘That’s true!!’ shouted the seventh man. ‘Why should he get £10 back when I
got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks’

‘Wait a minute,’ yelled the first four men in unison. ‘We didn’t get
anything at all. The system exploits the poor’

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down
and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they
discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of
them for even half of the bill.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is how
our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start
drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Will the last Englishman to leave the country please turn out the lights
because there will be no one left willing pay to the bill.

 
 

Trust

08 Dec

Why are the authorities – that so blatantly abuse their position of trust and are themselves unlawful (let me know if you want my list) – are so indignant when others take similar actions ?



I was thinking damian green – i am now thinking plane stupid at stanstead.



Whatever happenned about our right to protest ?



i am sorry that people got delayed becasue of these ‘infuruating people’ – but heh – how many times are the tubes and trains delayed by;



1) leaves on the rail – STILL
2) engineering work not finished on time – OVER and OVER again
3) some poor peep who just can’t take it any more – and throw themselves in front of a train



ok – that last one isn’t that often – but arguing that people ” need to take legal and proper actions about their protests through the ‘proper channels’ ” are smoking something that has to be illegal – and definitely won’t be in a pub !

 
 

It Still Isn’t Over

14 Nov

So … in the recent US elections the Democrates ended up with 57 seats in the senate – the republicans 40. But wait – I thought there were 100 seats in the senate ? What about the other three … turns out – they are still counting :

Votes are still being counted in Minnesota, where our candidate Al Franken is trailing by just 200 votes out of over 2 million cast. In Georgia, Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss failed to get a majority of the votes, which means he and Democratic candidate Jim Martin are headed for a brand-new runoff election on December 2. And in Alaska, Democrat Mark Begich has come from behind to take a solid 800-vote lead with 40,000 ballots still to be counted.

Read more here

 
No Comments

Posted in politics

 

America will find opportunity in scarcity

04 Nov

… an article by Eric Schmidt

so it isn’t just Mr Byrne …

 
 

Election Day – I Can’t; But You Can

04 Nov

This received from a friend through another blog I have – but too good not to pass on – and as a Green Card holder myself – I totally concur – whatever happenned to ‘no taxation without representation’ – oh yes – that doesn’t even apply in some Republican dominated states even if you are an American – much less if you are an alien

an email blast from David Byrne received last night:

“Pardon the bulk mailing. I Can’t Vote. I am an immigrant with a Green Card and, therefore, I am not eligible to vote in a federal election. FYI – I can get drafted (luckily, Daniel Berrigan burned my draft board’s records) and I pay taxes, yet I cannot vote for President. On Election Day, I see my neighbors heading to the nearby elementary school to cast their ballots. The voting booth joint is a great leveler; the whole neighborhood – rich, poor, old, young, decrepit and spunky – they all turn out in one day.

But most of you can vote. What can I say? The Republicans have made us less safe than before 9/11, bankrupted this economy, started an illegal war they can’t – and don’t intend to – finish, removed what sympathy (after 9/11) and respect the world had for the US, and have robbed US citizens of many of their basic rights. Global warming? What’s that? Science and education? Investment in our future? No, thanks – we’ll stick with a good ‘ole hockey mom. Ignorant, and fucking proud of it, as is always the case.

Although it looks like a shoo-in, it ain’t over ’til Florida. And there are plenty of racists in this country who will vote against their own best interests. So please, get to your local elementary school, post office, town hall, or whatever, and cast your vote and make this a country we can all be proud of. We can get out of this mess, and life can be better than it is.

David Byrne
NYC”

 
 

Sarah Palin – info courtesy of MoveOn

01 Sep

She was elected Alaska’s governor a little over a year and a half ago. Her previous office was mayor of Wasilla, a small town outside Anchorage. She has no foreign policy experience.

  • Palin is strongly anti-choice, opposing abortion even in the case of rape or incest.
  • She supported right-wing extremist Pat Buchanan for president in 2000.
  • Palin thinks creationism should be taught in public schools.
  • She’s doesn’t think humans are the cause of climate change.
  • She’s solidly in line with John McCain’s “Big Oil first” energy policy. She’s pushed hard for more oil drilling and says renewables won’t be ready for years. She also sued the Bush administration for listing polar bears as an endangered species—she was worried it would interfere with more oil drilling in Alaska.
  • How closely did John McCain vet this choice? He met Sarah Palin once at a meeting. They spoke a second time, last Sunday, when he called her about being vice-president. Then he offered her the position.
  • This is information the American people need to see. Please take a moment to forward this email to your friends and family.

  • We also asked Alaska MoveOn members what the rest of us should know about their governor. The response was striking. Here’s a sample:

    She is really just a mayor from a small town outside Anchorage who has been a governor for only 1.5 years, and has ZERO national and international experience. I shudder to think that she could be the person taking that 3AM call on the White House hotline, and the one who could potentially be charged with leading the US in the volatile international scene that exists today. —Rose M., Fairbanks, AK

    She is VERY, VERY conservative, and far from perfect. She’s a hunter and fisherwoman, but votes against the environment again and again. She ran on ethics reform, but is currently under investigation for several charges involving hiring and firing of state officials. She has NO experience beyond Alaska. —Christine B., Denali Park, AK

    As an Alaskan and a feminist, I am beyond words at this announcement. Palin is not a feminist, and she is not the reformer she claims to be. —Karen L., Anchorage, AK

    Alaskans, collectively, are just as stunned as the rest of the nation. She is doing well running our State, but is totally inexperienced on the national level, and very much unequipped to run the nation, if it came to that. She is as far right as one can get, which has already been communicated on the news. In our office of thirty employees (dems, republicans, and nonpartisans), not one person feels she is ready for the V.P. position.—Sherry C., Anchorage, AK

    She’s vehemently anti-choice and doesn’t care about protecting our natural resources, even though she has worked as a fisherman. McCain chose her to pick up the Hillary voters, but Palin is no Hillary. —Marina L., Juneau, AK

    I think she’s far too inexperienced to be in this position. I’m all for a woman in the White House, but not one who hasn’t done anything to deserve it. There are far many other women who have worked their way up and have much more experience that would have been better choices. This is a patronizing decision on John McCain’s part- and insulting to females everywhere that he would assume he’ll get our vote by putting “A Woman” in that position.—Jennifer M., Anchorage, AK

    So Governor Palin is a staunch anti-choice religious conservative. She’s a global warming denier who shares John McCain’s commitment to Big Oil. And she’s dramatically inexperienced.

    In the next few days, many Americans will be wondering what McCain’s vice-presidential choice means. Please pass this information along to your friends and family.

    Sources:

    1. “Sarah Palin,” Wikipedia, Accessed August 29, 2008

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin

    2. “McCain Selects Anti-Choice Sarah Palin as Running Mate,” NARAL Pro-Choice America, August 29, 2008
    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17515&id=13661-5515541-i0dm22x&t=1

    3. “Sarah Palin, Buchananite,” The Nation, August 29, 2008
    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17736&id=13661-5515541-i0dm22x&t=2

    4. “‘Creation science’ enters the race,” Anchorage Daily News, October 27, 2006
    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17737&id=13661-5515541-i0dm22x&t=3

    5. “Palin buys climate denial PR spin—ignores science,” Huffington Post, August 29, 2008

    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17517&id=13661-5515541-i0dm22x&t=4

    6. “McCain VP Pick Completes Shift to Bush Energy Policy,” Sierra Club, August 29, 2008

    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17518&id=13661-5515541-i0dm22x&t=5

    “Choice of Palin Promises Failed Energy Policies of the Past,” League of Conservation Voters, August 29, 2008

    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17519&id=13661-5515541-i0dm22x&t=6

    “Protecting polar bears gets in way of drilling for oil, says governor,” The Times of London, May 23, 2008

    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17520&id=13661-5515541-i0dm22x&t=7

    7 “McCain met Palin once before yesterday,” MSNBC, August 29, 2008

    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=21119&id=13661-5515541-i0dm22x&t=8

     
     

    England My England

    05 Aug

    When I first read this FT article – ‘My Blueprint For A better Britain’, by Tyler Brule …. not only did I agree – but it conjoured up a memory.

    I recalled a poem that had been instilled into me as a youth called ‘England My England’, penned by one ‘William Ernest Henley’ and reproduced below for completeness. I couldn’t quite recall who wrote it – so did some research.

    Turns out that he also wrote those immortal words :

    “I am the master of my fate, I am the captain of my soul” … that ends his poem ‘Invictus’.

    Sidenote

    According to Wikipedia (and who are we to argue with them) …. Timothy McVeigh quoyed Invictus as his final statement, prior to execution

    Read the article. Agree, disagree. I would like to hear from you.

    The question is – does anyone else wonder about our country ? Is anyone – anywhere – doing anything about it ?

    England My England

    What have I done for you,
    England, my England?
    What is there I would not do,
    England, my own?
    With your glorious eyes austere,
    As the Lord were walking near,
    Whispering terrible things and dear
    As the Song on your bugles blown,
    England
    Round the world on your bugles blown!

    Where shall the watchful sun,
    England, my England,
    Match the master-work you’ve done,
    England, my own?
    When shall he rejoice agen
    Such a breed of mighty men
    As come forward, one to ten,
    To the Song on your bugles blown,
    England
    Down the years on your bugles blown?

    Ever the faith endures,
    England, my England:–
    ‘Take and break us: we are yours,
    England, my own!
    Life is good, and joy runs high
    Between English earth and sky:
    Death is death; but we shall die
    To the Song on your bugles blown,
    England
    To the stars on your bugles blown!’

    They call you proud and hard,
    England, my England:
    You with worlds to watch and ward,
    England, my own!
    You whose mail’d hand keeps the keys
    Of such teeming destinies,
    You could know nor dread nor ease
    Were the Song on your bugles blown,
    England,
    Round the Pit on your bugles blown!

    Mother of Ships whose might,
    England, my England,
    Is the fierce old Sea’s delight,
    England, my own,
    Chosen daughter of the Lord,
    Spouse-in-Chief of the ancient Sword,
    There ‘s the menace of the Word
    In the Song on your bugles blown,
    England,
    Out of heaven on your bugles blown!

    William Ernest Henley

    And on a side note, here’s a thought ….

    Someone writes an article in London. It gets published into the FT. My friend in California receives the FT on a daily basis. He cuts out the column and sends it to us through the mail system. Received in London, I search the site for the online version of the article. I find it – and on the plane that morning (by coincidence I am flying to California), I write this post. Having landed in California, I find a connection – and publish – reproduced here for your delectation. It just shows that the net is only part of the story.

     
     

    The US / UK Extradition Treaty

    25 Jul

    This article is reproduced from the International Accountant. Issue 42. July 2008. The words of the article speak for themselves ….
    To quote Ben Hayes of Statewatch

    “Under the new treaty, the allegations of the US government will be enough to secure the extradition of people from the UK. However, if the UK wants to extradite someone from the US, evidence to the standard of a “reasonable” demonstration of guilt will still be required.

    No other EU countries would accept this US demand, either politically or constitutionally. Yet the UK government not only acquiesced, but did so taking advantage of arcane legislative powers to see the treaty signed and implemented without any parliamentary debate or scrutiny.

    Read on for the full article
    The AIA has been campaigning this
    month to give British businessmen
    the right to be tried in the UK, and
    is calling for Britain’s withdrawal from the
    controversial ‘one way’ extradition treaty
    which has placed a number of UK businessmen
    in a frightening position.

    The Chief Executive of engineering firm
    Morgan Crucible, Ian Norris, is one of the
    latest British businessman to be involved in the
    ongoing wrangle over the UK’s hugely unpopular
    extradition treaty with the US. After the
    prolonged dispute over the fate of the NatWest
    Three, AIA believes that it is time for the
    government to sort out this travesty of justice
    once and for all. AIA Chief Executive Philip
    Turnbull has described the Treaty as “unjust and
    failing to protect the rights of British citizens.”
    We are in a situation where the US does not
    need to show that an accused British citizen
    has a case to answer, yet the UK must present a
    case that can be tested by the courts in order to
    extradite an American.

    Introduced following 9/11 in an attempt
    to speed up the extradition of terrorists, the
    2003 Extradition Treaty has been used by the
    US Justice Department as a fast-track way of
    extraditing British businessmen. Furthermore, it
    has not been ratified by the US Congress and it
    is unlikely that it ever will be as the agreement
    limits human rights and is, therefore, deemed to
    be contrary to the American constitution.
    AIA has suggested that the treaty has
    been misused to target alleged ‘white collar
    criminals’ in the UK even where there is no
    clear causal link with the US. For example,
    the NatWest Three were extradited in 2006
    following their alleged fraud activities
    involving the bankrupt Enron even though
    their alleged crime was not directly linked to
    the collapse of the US energy company.
    In the case of Ian Norris, there was blatant
    injustice. Following the retirement of the Chief
    Executive in 2002, he was accused of conspiring
    to fix the price of carbon brushes as well as two
    further charges to pervert the course of justice.
    Even though price fixing was not a crime in the
    UK before 2002, the US authorities pursued the
    charges. In fact, Mr Norris was not given the
    opportunity to defend the case against him, as
    under the treaty, the US authorities are able
    to set out the charges without supplying any
    evidence.

    AIA believes that the treaty is quite simply
    bad for trade between the two countries. It
    reflects negatively on business in the UK, whose
    citizens deserve to receive the same protection
    as US citizens from the treaty. This is an issue
    that AIA has followed with growing incredulity
    over the last five years.

    In a recent meeting with David Blunkett, who
    was home secretary at the time of the renewal
    of the treaty, AIA was told that the NatWest
    Three’s “guilty plea indicated that the claims
    made that they should not be extradited were
    somewhat wide of the mark.”
    Guilt or innocence is not the issue here, it is
    the fact that the treaty is being used to target
    alleged white-collar crimes and that British
    businessmen are not being given the right to be
    tried by British courts.

    Despite attempts to restrict the treaty
    to alleged terrorist crimes, and an ongoing
    campaign by a national newspaper to change
    the treaty so that British executives are tried
    in the UK for British offences, the government
    has failed to rectify the problem of this one-
    way treaty. As the House of Lords has upheld
    Ian Norris’ long fight to avoid extradition, AIA
    believes it is time for the government to address
    the issue of the imbalance in the transatlantic
    extradition procedure. If the US is not willing
    to ratify its side of the agreement, then AIA
    believes Britain should withdraw its compliance.
    Now is the time for the British business
    community to join forces and challenge this
    unjust legislation.

     
     

    Semantics can’t mask Bush’s chicanery

    29 May

    Robert Fisk – as always a fascinating read – regardless of what you are doing right now.

    ‘Read All ‘Abart’ It’

    passed on – with thanks to Robert Fisk.

     
     

    Economic Drama …

    04 Apr

    … Bush Is Largely Offstage

    … umm surely ? In any drama he is off stage – until ‘mission accomplished’

    passed on – with thanks (I think) to the New York Times